N
Ngai, Naomi Hoi-kei
PPG
2.7
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
N
Ngai, Naomi Hoi-kei
PPG
2.7
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
Shot mix
Distribution by shot type
Legend
2 pt
3 pt
FT
Heatmap
Accuracy by shot region













Accuracy scale
Less
More
Shot mix
Accuracy by shot type
- 2 pt32.7%Shots count: 16/49
- 3 pt33.3%Shots count: 1/3
- FT75.0%Shots count: 3/4
Scoring impact
Points contribution from player, per season
HKDBL Season 11
HKDBL6 games played
7.6%
Share of team PPG
3.8 PPG
50.5 team
HKDBL Season 12
HKDBL Season 124 games played
4.7%
Share of team PPG
2.3 PPG
48.3 team
HKDBL Season 11 Playoff
HKDBL Season 11 Playoff2 games played
1.9%
Share of team PPG
1.0 PPG
52.5 team
HKDBL Season 12 Playoff
HKDBL Season 12 Playoff2 games played
4.4%
Share of team PPG
2.0 PPG
45.5 team
All Seasons
Overall
4.6%
Share of team PPG
2.3 PPG
49.2 team
Shot mix
Distribution by shot type
Legend
2 pt
3 pt
FT
Heatmap
Accuracy by shot region













Accuracy scale
Less
More
Shot mix
Accuracy by shot type
- 2 pt32.7%Shots count: 16/49
- 3 pt33.3%Shots count: 1/3
- FT75.0%Shots count: 3/4
Scoring impact
Points contribution from player, per season
HKDBL Season 11
HKDBL6 games played
7.6%
Share of team PPG
3.8 PPG
50.5 team
HKDBL Season 12
HKDBL Season 124 games played
4.7%
Share of team PPG
2.3 PPG
48.3 team
HKDBL Season 11 Playoff
HKDBL Season 11 Playoff2 games played
1.9%
Share of team PPG
1.0 PPG
52.5 team
HKDBL Season 12 Playoff
HKDBL Season 12 Playoff2 games played
4.4%
Share of team PPG
2.0 PPG
45.5 team
All Seasons
Overall
4.6%
Share of team PPG
2.3 PPG
49.2 team
Player
Match statistics
All stats
MATCH | DATE↓ | SCORE | PTS | 1PT | 2PT | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT HUS | Aug 29 | 41-55 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-1 (100%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 1 |
LIT TEA | Aug 22 | 50-15 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-1 (100%) | 0-1 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 1 | 1 |
PUM LIT | May 30 | 30-58 | 4 | 0-0 (0%) | 2-9 (22%) | 0-1 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 1 |
AMA LIT | May 16 | 23-52 | 3 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-9 (11%) | 0-0 (0%) | 1-2 (50%) | 2 | 0 | 0 |
LIT HUS | Apr 25 | 38-35 | 0 | 0-0 (0%) | 0-2 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ALI LIT | Mar 28 | 36-45 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-3 (33%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LIT HUS | Feb 15 | 61-59 | 0 | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LIT ALI | Jan 31 | 44-34 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-5 (20%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 2 |
PUM LIT | Jan 10 | 35-56 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 0-2 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 2-2 (100%) | 0 | 2 | 3 |
LIT ALI | Dec 13 | 52-24 | 2 | 0-0 (0%) | 1-3 (33%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
AMA LIT | Nov 29 | 19-62 | 6 | 0-0 (0%) | 3-5 (60%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 2 | 2 | 2 |
LIT HUS | Nov 15 | 39-34 | 4 | 0-0 (0%) | 2-3 (67%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
ALI LIT | Nov 08 | 30-41 | 3 | 0-0 (0%) | 0-2 (0%) | 1-1 (100%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LIT PUM | Nov 01 | 53-28 | 6 | 0-0 (0%) | 3-4 (75%) | 0-0 (0%) | 0-0 (0%) | 2 | 0 | 1 |
