TEA
Team Sze Sze (Season 14)
10
W
0
L
0
D
PPG
66.4
RPG
42.0
APG
16.0
TEA
Team Sze Sze (Season 14)
10
W
0
L
0
D
PPG
66.4
RPG
42.0
APG
16.0
Shot Distribution
Breakdown of shot types
Shot Chart
Accuracy by shot region
Less Accurate
More Accurate
Shot Accuracy
Accuracy percentage by shot type
Jersey Number
PTS↓
REB
AST
7
**Ho Pui Lam Fanta
151
PTS
53
REB
18
AST
9
Wu Sum Yee
133
PTS
33
REB
19
AST
10
**Siu Lee Kwan Ankie
114
PTS
78
REB
24
AST
2
Chan Na Wan
69
PTS
24
REB
21
AST
27
Yeung Chau Yung
38
PTS
19
REB
13
AST
4
Chong Sin Han
36
PTS
17
REB
19
AST
32
Li Yee Man Tracy
34
PTS
34
REB
7
AST
3
Wang Minting
24
PTS
17
REB
2
AST
33
Cheung Pui Kin Maggie
20
PTS
75
REB
9
AST
19
Chan Ching Hang
16
PTS
8
REB
2
AST
3
Leung Yin Ling Elaine
14
PTS
14
REB
5
AST
23
Poon Hoi Lam
6
PTS
20
REB
8
AST
1
*Wong Wing Lam
4
PTS
23
REB
6
AST
1
Yau Yat Ki
3
PTS
4
REB
7
AST
77
Lo ka wing
2
PTS
1
REB
0
AST
91
Lai Ching Au
0
PTS
0
REB
0
AST
Shot Distribution
Breakdown of shot types
Shot Chart
Accuracy by shot region
Less Accurate
More Accurate
Shot Accuracy
Accuracy percentage by shot type
Jersey Number
PTS↓
REB
AST
7
**Ho Pui Lam Fanta
151
PTS
53
REB
18
AST
9
Wu Sum Yee
133
PTS
33
REB
19
AST
10
**Siu Lee Kwan Ankie
114
PTS
78
REB
24
AST
2
Chan Na Wan
69
PTS
24
REB
21
AST
27
Yeung Chau Yung
38
PTS
19
REB
13
AST
4
Chong Sin Han
36
PTS
17
REB
19
AST
32
Li Yee Man Tracy
34
PTS
34
REB
7
AST
3
Wang Minting
24
PTS
17
REB
2
AST
33
Cheung Pui Kin Maggie
20
PTS
75
REB
9
AST
19
Chan Ching Hang
16
PTS
8
REB
2
AST
3
Leung Yin Ling Elaine
14
PTS
14
REB
5
AST
23
Poon Hoi Lam
6
PTS
20
REB
8
AST
1
*Wong Wing Lam
4
PTS
23
REB
6
AST
1
Yau Yat Ki
3
PTS
4
REB
7
AST
77
Lo ka wing
2
PTS
1
REB
0
AST
91
Lai Ching Au
0
PTS
0
REB
0
AST
Match Results
All Stats
Match | Date↓ | Score | PTS | 1PT | 2PT | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEA HUS | Jun 27 | 59-55 | 59 | 0-0 (0%) | 15-50 (30%) | 5-31 (16%) | 14-19 (74%) | 57 | 14 | 25 |
TEA LIT | Jun 13 | 81-51 | 81 | 0-0 (0%) | 27-46 (59%) | 9-23 (39%) | 0-3 (0%) | 27 | 29 | 11 |
TEA PUM | Jun 04 | 95-34 | 95 | 0-0 (0%) | 26-56 (46%) | 12-31 (39%) | 7-9 (78%) | 51 | 24 | 6 |
PUM TEA | Apr 30 | 30-66 | 66 | 0-0 (0%) | 24-48 (50%) | 5-25 (20%) | 3-7 (43%) | 45 | 14 | 17 |
TEA AMA | Apr 23 | 53-24 | 53 | 0-0 (0%) | 17-39 (44%) | 5-12 (42%) | 4-9 (44%) | 35 | 14 | 16 |
TEA THE | Apr 18 | 74-51 | 74 | 0-0 (0%) | 23-51 (45%) | 8-24 (33%) | 4-7 (57%) | 35 | 22 | 9 |
LIT TEA | Mar 12 | 22-30 | 30 | 0-0 (0%) | 12-32 (38%) | 1-17 (6%) | 3-3 (100%) | 35 | 7 | 20 |
HUS TEA | Mar 05 | 25-63 | 63 | 0-0 (0%) | 20-49 (41%) | 5-21 (24%) | 8-12 (67%) | 40 | 11 | 7 |
PUM TEA | Feb 27 | 30-73 | 73 | 0-0 (0%) | 32-72 (44%) | 1-15 (7%) | 6-9 (67%) | 65 | 14 | 10 |
TEA A | Feb 20 | 70-29 | 70 | 0-0 (0%) | 27-47 (57%) | 4-15 (27%) | 4-7 (57%) | 30 | 11 | 11 |
Are you the organiser? Manage this team here.